From dadac81b1b86196fcc48fb87620403c4a7174f06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Nesterov Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:13:26 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] fix kill_proc_info() vs fork() theoretical race copy_process: attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PID, p->pid); attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_TGID, p->tgid); What if kill_proc_info(p->pid) happens in between? copy_process() holds current->sighand.siglock, so we are safe in CLONE_THREAD case, because current->sighand == p->sighand. Otherwise, p->sighand is unlocked, the new process is already visible to the find_task_by_pid(), but have a copy of parent's 'struct pid' in ->pids[PIDTYPE_TGID]. This means that __group_complete_signal() may hang while doing do ... while (next_thread() != p) We can solve this problem if we reverse these 2 attach_pid()s: attach_pid() does wmb() group_send_sig_info() calls spin_lock(), which provides a read barrier. // Yes ? I don't think we can hit this race in practice, but still. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Roland McGrath Cc: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/fork.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c index 3683ce10f4a..fbea12d7a94 100644 --- a/kernel/fork.c +++ b/kernel/fork.c @@ -1173,8 +1173,6 @@ static task_t *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags, if (unlikely(p->ptrace & PT_PTRACED)) __ptrace_link(p, current->parent); - attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PID, p->pid); - attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_TGID, p->tgid); if (thread_group_leader(p)) { p->signal->tty = current->signal->tty; p->signal->pgrp = process_group(current); @@ -1184,6 +1182,8 @@ static task_t *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags, if (p->pid) __get_cpu_var(process_counts)++; } + attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_TGID, p->tgid); + attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PID, p->pid); nr_threads++; total_forks++; -- 2.41.1