From d90bf5a976793edfa88d3bb2393f0231eb8ce1e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:14:05 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] [NET]: rt_check_expire() can take a long time, add a cond_resched() On commit 39c90ece7565f5c47110c2fa77409d7a9478bd5b: [IPV4]: Convert rt_check_expire() from softirq processing to workqueue. we converted rt_check_expire() from softirq to workqueue, allowing the function to perform all work it was supposed to do. When the IP route cache is big, rt_check_expire() can take a long time to run. (default settings : 20% of the hash table is scanned at each invocation) Adding cond_resched() helps giving cpu to higher priority tasks if necessary. Using a "if (need_resched())" test before calling "cond_resched();" is necessary to avoid spending too much time doing the resched check. (My tests gave a time reduction from 88 ms to 25 ms per rt_check_expire() run on my i686 test machine) Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/ipv4/route.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c index 45651834e1e..1bff9ed349f 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/route.c +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c @@ -578,6 +578,9 @@ static void rt_check_expire(struct work_struct *work) i = (i + 1) & rt_hash_mask; rthp = &rt_hash_table[i].chain; + if (need_resched()) + cond_resched(); + if (*rthp == NULL) continue; spin_lock_bh(rt_hash_lock_addr(i)); -- 2.41.1