From a4a16beadea041ab601e65b264b568e8b6b4f68d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:05:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] oprofile: fix an overflow in ppro code reset_value was changed from long to u64 in commit b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8 (oprofile: Implement Intel architectural perfmon support) But dynamic allocation of this array use a wrong type (long instead of u64) Cc: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: Robert Richter --- arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c index 3f1b81a83e2..716d26f0e5d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c +++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static void ppro_setup_ctrs(struct op_msrs const * const msrs) int i; if (!reset_value) { - reset_value = kmalloc(sizeof(unsigned) * num_counters, + reset_value = kmalloc(sizeof(reset_value[0]) * num_counters, GFP_ATOMIC); if (!reset_value) return; -- 2.41.1