From a40a7d15ba602b547f56b7b19e0282fe4fc3dee3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Emelyanov Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:40:38 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [SCTP]: IPv4 vs IPv6 addresses mess in sctp_inet[6]addr_event. All IP addresses that are present in a system are duplicated on struct sctp_sockaddr_entry. They are linked in the global list called sctp_local_addr_list. And this struct unions IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. So, there can be rare case, when a sockaddr_in.sin_addr coincides with the corresponding part of the sockaddr_in6 and the notifier for IPv4 will carry away an IPv6 entry. The fix is to check the family before comparing the addresses. Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/sctp/ipv6.c | 5 +++-- net/sctp/protocol.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c index b1e05d719f9..85f1495e0ed 100644 --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c @@ -110,8 +110,9 @@ static int sctp_inet6addr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev, spin_lock_bh(&sctp_local_addr_lock); list_for_each_entry_safe(addr, temp, &sctp_local_addr_list, list) { - if (ipv6_addr_equal(&addr->a.v6.sin6_addr, - &ifa->addr)) { + if (addr->a.sa.sa_family == AF_INET6 && + ipv6_addr_equal(&addr->a.v6.sin6_addr, + &ifa->addr)) { found = 1; addr->valid = 0; list_del_rcu(&addr->list); diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c index f90091a1b9c..c2dd65d9f38 100644 --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c @@ -647,7 +647,9 @@ static int sctp_inetaddr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev, spin_lock_bh(&sctp_local_addr_lock); list_for_each_entry_safe(addr, temp, &sctp_local_addr_list, list) { - if (addr->a.v4.sin_addr.s_addr == ifa->ifa_local) { + if (addr->a.sa.sa_family == AF_INET && + addr->a.v4.sin_addr.s_addr == + ifa->ifa_local) { found = 1; addr->valid = 0; list_del_rcu(&addr->list); -- 2.41.1