From 9cf6b720f84d6999ff9a514d0a939dd183846aaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jens Axboe Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 14:48:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] block: fsync_buffers_list() should use SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG Then it can submit all the buffers without unplugging for each one. We will kick off the pending IO if we come across a new address space. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/buffer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c index 5d55a896ff7..43afaa5d690 100644 --- a/fs/buffer.c +++ b/fs/buffer.c @@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ static int fsync_buffers_list(spinlock_t *lock, struct list_head *list) { struct buffer_head *bh; struct list_head tmp; - struct address_space *mapping; + struct address_space *mapping, *prev_mapping = NULL; int err = 0, err2; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp); @@ -762,7 +762,18 @@ static int fsync_buffers_list(spinlock_t *lock, struct list_head *list) * contents - it is a noop if I/O is still in * flight on potentially older contents. */ - ll_rw_block(SWRITE_SYNC, 1, &bh); + ll_rw_block(SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG, 1, &bh); + + /* + * Kick off IO for the previous mapping. Note + * that we will not run the very last mapping, + * wait_on_buffer() will do that for us + * through sync_buffer(). + */ + if (prev_mapping && prev_mapping != mapping) + blk_run_address_space(prev_mapping); + prev_mapping = mapping; + brelse(bh); spin_lock(lock); } @@ -2957,12 +2968,13 @@ void ll_rw_block(int rw, int nr, struct buffer_head *bhs[]) for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) { struct buffer_head *bh = bhs[i]; - if (rw == SWRITE || rw == SWRITE_SYNC) + if (rw == SWRITE || rw == SWRITE_SYNC || rw == SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG) lock_buffer(bh); else if (!trylock_buffer(bh)) continue; - if (rw == WRITE || rw == SWRITE || rw == SWRITE_SYNC) { + if (rw == WRITE || rw == SWRITE || rw == SWRITE_SYNC || + rw == SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG) { if (test_clear_buffer_dirty(bh)) { bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_write_sync; get_bh(bh); -- 2.41.1