From 940959e93949e839c14f8ddc3b9b0e34a2ab6e29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:33:42 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] sched: fixlet for group load balance We should not only correct the increment for the initial group, but should be consistent and do so for all the groups we encounter. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched_fair.c | 27 ++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c index c2089976345..0c59da7e312 100644 --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c @@ -1027,7 +1027,6 @@ static long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, long wl, long wg) { struct sched_entity *se = tg->se[cpu]; - long more_w; if (!tg->parent) return wl; @@ -1039,18 +1038,17 @@ static long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, if (!wl && sched_feat(ASYM_EFF_LOAD)) return wl; - /* - * Instead of using this increment, also add the difference - * between when the shares were last updated and now. - */ - more_w = se->my_q->load.weight - se->my_q->rq_weight; - wl += more_w; - wg += more_w; - for_each_sched_entity(se) { -#define D(n) (likely(n) ? (n) : 1) - long S, rw, s, a, b; + long more_w; + + /* + * Instead of using this increment, also add the difference + * between when the shares were last updated and now. + */ + more_w = se->my_q->load.weight - se->my_q->rq_weight; + wl += more_w; + wg += more_w; S = se->my_q->tg->shares; s = se->my_q->shares; @@ -1059,7 +1057,11 @@ static long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, a = S*(rw + wl); b = S*rw + s*wg; - wl = s*(a-b)/D(b); + wl = s*(a-b); + + if (likely(b)) + wl /= b; + /* * Assume the group is already running and will * thus already be accounted for in the weight. @@ -1068,7 +1070,6 @@ static long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, * alter the group weight. */ wg = 0; -#undef D } return wl; -- 2.41.1