From 887007561ae58628f03aa9046949747c04f63be8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:08:09 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] memcg: fix reclaim result checks check_under_limit logic was wrong and this check should be against mem_over_limit rather than mem. Reported-by: Li Zefan Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Balbir Singh Cc: Daisuke Nishimura Cc: Badari Pulavarty Cc: Jan Blunck Cc: Hirokazu Takahashi Cc: Nick Piggin Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/memcontrol.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 659b0c58f13..9bf5d7c8ede 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -709,17 +709,17 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm, * current usage of the cgroup before giving up * */ - if (!do_swap_account && - res_counter_check_under_limit(&mem->res)) - continue; - if (do_swap_account && - res_counter_check_under_limit(&mem->memsw)) - continue; + if (do_swap_account) { + if (res_counter_check_under_limit(&mem_over_limit->res) && + res_counter_check_under_limit(&mem_over_limit->memsw)) + continue; + } else if (res_counter_check_under_limit(&mem_over_limit->res)) + continue; if (!nr_retries--) { if (oom) { - mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(mem, gfp_mask); - mem->last_oom_jiffies = jiffies; + mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask); + mem_over_limit->last_oom_jiffies = jiffies; } goto nomem; } -- 2.41.1