From 85b9e783cbc8cf4acc7bfaa76f37ea26b426f514 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Fasheh Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:40:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2: Don't allocate handle early in ocfs2_rename() It isn't used until ocfs2_start_trans() anyway. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh --- fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c index ca012446d8e..8d03ef44686 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c @@ -1114,13 +1114,6 @@ static int ocfs2_rename(struct inode *old_dir, rename_lock = 1; } - handle = ocfs2_alloc_handle(osb); - if (handle == NULL) { - status = -ENOMEM; - mlog_errno(status); - goto bail; - } - /* if old and new are the same, this'll just do one lock. */ status = ocfs2_double_lock(osb, &old_dir_bh, old_dir, &new_dir_bh, new_dir); @@ -1291,7 +1284,7 @@ static int ocfs2_rename(struct inode *old_dir, } } - handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, handle, OCFS2_RENAME_CREDITS); + handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, NULL, OCFS2_RENAME_CREDITS); if (IS_ERR(handle)) { status = PTR_ERR(handle); handle = NULL; -- 2.41.1