From 71c8d4c3aad3132765d30b05dce98bb8a9508f02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:42:56 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] uml: fix spinlock recursion and sleep-inside-spinlock in error path In this error path, when the interface has had a problem, we call dev_close(), which is disallowed for two reasons: *) takes again the UML internal spinlock, inside the ->stop method of this device *) can be called in process context only, while we're in interrupt context. I've also thought that calling dev_close() may be a wrong policy to follow, but it's not up to me to decide that. However, we may end up with multiple dev_close() queued on the same device. But the initial test for (dev->flags & IFF_UP) makes this harmless, though - and dev_close() is supposed to care about races with itself. So there's no harm in delaying the shutdown, IMHO. Something to mark the interface as "going to shutdown" would be appreciated, but dev_deactivate has the same problems as dev_close(), so we can't use it either. Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso Cc: Jeff Dike Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c index f3442ce29a2..8ebb2241ad4 100644 --- a/arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c +++ b/arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c @@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static int uml_net_rx(struct net_device *dev) return pkt_len; } +static void uml_dev_close(void* dev) +{ + dev_close( (struct net_device *) dev); +} + irqreturn_t uml_net_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) { struct net_device *dev = dev_id; @@ -80,15 +85,21 @@ irqreturn_t uml_net_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) spin_lock(&lp->lock); while((err = uml_net_rx(dev)) > 0) ; if(err < 0) { + DECLARE_WORK(close_work, uml_dev_close, dev); printk(KERN_ERR "Device '%s' read returned %d, shutting it down\n", dev->name, err); - dev_close(dev); + /* dev_close can't be called in interrupt context, and takes + * again lp->lock. + * And dev_close() can be safely called multiple times on the + * same device, since it tests for (dev->flags & IFF_UP). So + * there's no harm in delaying the device shutdown. */ + schedule_work(&close_work); goto out; } reactivate_fd(lp->fd, UM_ETH_IRQ); - out: +out: spin_unlock(&lp->lock); return(IRQ_HANDLED); } -- 2.41.1