From 6bc7efe8efa627077f8f65d01dbb762fc9356a2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian McDonald Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:37:45 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] loss_interval: Fix timeval initialisation When compiling with EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W noticed that tstamp is not initialised correctly in dccp_li_calc_first_li. Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: Ian McDonald --- net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c index 2d203ae41aa..9686a8de2e9 100644 --- a/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c +++ b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ static u32 ccid3_hc_rx_calc_first_li(struct sock *sk) struct dccp_rx_hist_entry *entry, *next, *tail = NULL; u32 x_recv, p; suseconds_t rtt, delta; - struct timeval tstamp = { 0, }; + struct timeval tstamp = { 0, 0 }; int interval = 0; int win_count = 0; int step = 0; -- 2.41.1