From 69cdf8f92a8dd191eee0e834c631d84a140b1121 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 16:55:13 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ipv6 route: Fix lifetime in netlink. We could not see appropriate lifetime if the route had been scheduled to expired at 0 (in jiffies). We should check rt6i_flags instead of rt6i_expires to determine whether lifetime is valid or not. Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> --- net/ipv6/route.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c index 98aa50c11dd..b45a7c0268c 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/route.c +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c @@ -2200,7 +2200,9 @@ static int rt6_fill_node(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rt6_info *rt, NLA_PUT_U32(skb, RTA_PRIORITY, rt->rt6i_metric); - expires = rt->rt6i_expires ? rt->rt6i_expires - jiffies : 0; + expires = (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_EXPIRES) ? + rt->rt6i_expires - jiffies : 0; + if (rtnl_put_cacheinfo(skb, &rt->u.dst, 0, 0, 0, expires, rt->u.dst.error) < 0) goto nla_put_failure; -- 2.41.3