From 5e710e37bde120bb069f691bee68e69ef4393173 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:26:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] lockdep: change scheduler annotation While thinking about David's graph walk lockdep patch it _finally_ dawned on me that there is no reason we have a lock class per cpu ... Sorry for being dense :-/ The below changes the annotation from a lock class per cpu, to a single nested lock, as the scheduler never holds more that 2 rq locks at a time anyway. If there was code requiring holding all rq locks this would not work and the original annotation would be the only option, but that not being the case, this is a much lighter one. Compiles and boots on a 2-way x86_64. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: David Miller Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index 0236958addc..655f1db26b1 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -600,7 +600,6 @@ struct rq { /* BKL stats */ unsigned int bkl_count; #endif - struct lock_class_key rq_lock_key; }; static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues); @@ -2759,10 +2758,10 @@ static void double_rq_lock(struct rq *rq1, struct rq *rq2) } else { if (rq1 < rq2) { spin_lock(&rq1->lock); - spin_lock(&rq2->lock); + spin_lock_nested(&rq2->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); } else { spin_lock(&rq2->lock); - spin_lock(&rq1->lock); + spin_lock_nested(&rq1->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); } } update_rq_clock(rq1); @@ -2805,10 +2804,10 @@ static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest) if (busiest < this_rq) { spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock); spin_lock(&busiest->lock); - spin_lock(&this_rq->lock); + spin_lock_nested(&this_rq->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); ret = 1; } else - spin_lock(&busiest->lock); + spin_lock_nested(&busiest->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); } return ret; } @@ -7998,7 +7997,6 @@ void __init sched_init(void) rq = cpu_rq(i); spin_lock_init(&rq->lock); - lockdep_set_class(&rq->lock, &rq->rq_lock_key); rq->nr_running = 0; init_cfs_rq(&rq->cfs, rq); init_rt_rq(&rq->rt, rq); -- 2.41.1