From 3bccfbc7a7ba4085817deae6e7c67daf0cbd045a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Venkat Yekkirala Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:42:35 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] IPsec: fix handling of errors for socket policies This treats the security errors encountered in the case of socket policy matching, the same as how these are treated in the case of main/sub policies, which is to return a full lookup failure. Signed-off-by: Venkat Yekkirala Signed-off-by: James Morris --- net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c index 695761ff132..7736b23c3f0 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c @@ -1016,12 +1016,16 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(struct sock *sk, int dir, struc sk->sk_family); int err = 0; - if (match) - err = security_xfrm_policy_lookup(pol, fl->secid, policy_to_flow_dir(dir)); - - if (match && !err) - xfrm_pol_hold(pol); - else + if (match) { + err = security_xfrm_policy_lookup(pol, fl->secid, + policy_to_flow_dir(dir)); + if (!err) + xfrm_pol_hold(pol); + else if (err == -ESRCH) + pol = NULL; + else + pol = ERR_PTR(err); + } else pol = NULL; } read_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock); @@ -1313,8 +1317,11 @@ restart: pol_dead = 0; xfrm_nr = 0; - if (sk && sk->sk_policy[1]) + if (sk && sk->sk_policy[1]) { policy = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, fl); + if (IS_ERR(policy)) + return PTR_ERR(policy); + } if (!policy) { /* To accelerate a bit... */ @@ -1607,8 +1614,11 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb, } pol = NULL; - if (sk && sk->sk_policy[dir]) + if (sk && sk->sk_policy[dir]) { pol = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, dir, &fl); + if (IS_ERR(pol)) + return 0; + } if (!pol) pol = flow_cache_lookup(&fl, family, fl_dir, -- 2.41.1