From 2cb0ebeeb664e6eefe06951709949203e04f7c7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniele Calore Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:34:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] x86: memtest fix use of reserve_early() Hi all, Wrong usage of 2nd parameter in reserve_early call. 66/75: reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad - start_bad, "BAD RAM"); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The correct way is to use 'end' address and not 'size'. As a bonus a fix to the printk format. Signed-off-by: Daniele Calore Acked-by: Yinghai Lu Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/mm/memtest.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c index 672e17f8262..9cab18b0b85 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c @@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ static void __init memtest(unsigned long start_phys, unsigned long size, last_bad += incr; } else { if (start_bad) { - printk(KERN_CONT "\n %010lx bad mem addr %010lx - %010lx reserved", + printk(KERN_CONT "\n %016lx bad mem addr %010lx - %010lx reserved", val, start_bad, last_bad + incr); - reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad - start_bad, "BAD RAM"); + reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad + incr, "BAD RAM"); } start_bad = last_bad = start_phys_aligned; } @@ -72,9 +72,8 @@ static void __init memtest(unsigned long start_phys, unsigned long size, if (start_bad) { printk(KERN_CONT "\n %016lx bad mem addr %010lx - %010lx reserved", val, start_bad, last_bad + incr); - reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad - start_bad, "BAD RAM"); + reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad + incr, "BAD RAM"); } - } /* default is disabled */ -- 2.41.1