From 1097f5e92107ca3950fabf5e1d724faa80c91e7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Chan Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:06:41 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] [BNX2]: Fix minor bug in bnx2_has_work(). It is more correct to get the status block from the bnx2_napi struct instead of the bnx2 struct. It happens that they are the same in this case because we are using the first MSIX vector. Signed-off-by: Michael Chan Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/bnx2.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c index 44734613ab3..18ed8068dc2 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bnx2.c +++ b/drivers/net/bnx2.c @@ -2903,8 +2903,7 @@ bnx2_tx_msix(int irq, void *dev_instance) static inline int bnx2_has_work(struct bnx2_napi *bnapi) { - struct bnx2 *bp = bnapi->bp; - struct status_block *sblk = bp->status_blk; + struct status_block *sblk = bnapi->status_blk; if ((bnx2_get_hw_rx_cons(bnapi) != bnapi->rx_cons) || (bnx2_get_hw_tx_cons(bnapi) != bnapi->hw_tx_cons)) -- 2.41.1