From 03d1d99c55649ca641b86d2e3489b167ede1671a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexey Starikovskiy Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:28:34 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: EC: fix dmesg spam regression Return OBF_1 optimization workaround http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8459 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy Signed-off-by: Len Brown --- drivers/acpi/ec.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c index 97dc16155a5..8917d754020 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ enum { EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, /* Address is being written */ EC_FLAGS_NO_WDATA_GPE, /* Don't expect WDATA GPE event */ EC_FLAGS_WDATA, /* Data is being written */ + EC_FLAGS_NO_OBF1_GPE, /* Don't expect GPE before read */ }; static int acpi_ec_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type); @@ -179,6 +180,10 @@ static inline int acpi_ec_check_status(struct acpi_ec *ec, enum ec_event event) static int acpi_ec_wait(struct acpi_ec *ec, enum ec_event event, int force_poll) { int ret = 0; + + if (unlikely(event == ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF_1 && + test_bit(EC_FLAGS_NO_OBF1_GPE, &ec->flags))) + force_poll = 1; if (unlikely(test_bit(EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, &ec->flags) && test_bit(EC_FLAGS_NO_ADDRESS_GPE, &ec->flags))) force_poll = 1; @@ -192,7 +197,12 @@ static int acpi_ec_wait(struct acpi_ec *ec, enum ec_event event, int force_poll) goto end; clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags); if (acpi_ec_check_status(ec, event)) { - if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, &ec->flags)) { + if (event == ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF_1) { + /* miss OBF_1 GPE, don't expect it */ + pr_info(PREFIX "missing OBF confirmation, " + "don't expect it any longer.\n"); + set_bit(EC_FLAGS_NO_OBF1_GPE, &ec->flags); + } else if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, &ec->flags)) { /* miss address GPE, don't expect it anymore */ pr_info(PREFIX "missing address confirmation, " "don't expect it any longer.\n"); -- 2.41.1