From 02888f41e9d7fa95d1f5b2f76e0f0af6ea8198cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:45:07 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] locks: fix flock_lock_file() comment This comment wasn't updated when lease support was added, and it makes essentially the same mistake that the code made before a recent bugfix. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields --- fs/locks.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index 6e22c8129a8..c7c69d29a57 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -715,8 +715,7 @@ next_task: } /* Try to create a FLOCK lock on filp. We always insert new FLOCK locks - * at the head of the list, but that's secret knowledge known only to - * flock_lock_file and posix_lock_file. + * after any leases, but before any posix locks. * * Note that if called with an FL_EXISTS argument, the caller may determine * whether or not a lock was successfully freed by testing the return -- 2.41.1