From: Arjan van de Ven Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:33:07 +0000 (+0100) Subject: x86: turn 64 bit x86 HANDLE_STACK into print_context_stack like 32 bit has X-Git-Tag: v2.6.25-rc1~1143^2~313 X-Git-Url: http://pilppa.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e4a94568b18c5d7d72741ebde5736d77d235743c;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git x86: turn 64 bit x86 HANDLE_STACK into print_context_stack like 32 bit has This patch turns the x86 64 bit HANDLE_STACK macro in the backtrace code into a function, just like 32 bit has. This is needed pre work in order to get exact backtraces for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER to work. The function and it's arguments are not the same as 32 bit; due to the exception/interrupt stack way of x86-64 there are a few differences. This patch should not have any behavior changes, only code movement. Due to the fragility and importance of the backtrace code, this needs to be well reviewed and well tested before merging into mainlne. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c index 62c4d8f46ee..b8303ed9505 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c @@ -212,10 +212,46 @@ static unsigned long *in_exception_stack(unsigned cpu, unsigned long stack, * severe exception (double fault, nmi, stack fault, debug, mce) hardware stack */ -static inline int valid_stack_ptr(struct thread_info *tinfo, void *p) +static inline int valid_stack_ptr(struct thread_info *tinfo, + void *p, unsigned int size, void *end) { void *t = (void *)tinfo; - return p > t && p < t + THREAD_SIZE - 3; + if (end) { + if (p < end && p >= (end-THREAD_SIZE)) + return 1; + else + return 0; + } + return p > t && p < t + THREAD_SIZE - size; +} + +static inline unsigned long print_context_stack(struct thread_info *tinfo, + unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp, + const struct stacktrace_ops *ops, void *data, + unsigned long *end) +{ + /* + * Print function call entries within a stack. 'cond' is the + * "end of stackframe" condition, that the 'stack++' + * iteration will eventually trigger. + */ + while (valid_stack_ptr(tinfo, stack, 3, end)) { + unsigned long addr = *stack++; + /* Use unlocked access here because except for NMIs + we should be already protected against module unloads */ + if (__kernel_text_address(addr)) { + /* + * If the address is either in the text segment of the + * kernel, or in the region which contains vmalloc'ed + * memory, it *may* be the address of a calling + * routine; if so, print it so that someone tracing + * down the cause of the crash will be able to figure + * out the call path that was taken. + */ + ops->address(data, addr, 1); + } + } + return bp; } void dump_trace(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pt_regs *regs, @@ -229,6 +265,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pt_regs *regs, if (!tsk) tsk = current; + tinfo = task_thread_info(tsk); if (!stack) { unsigned long dummy; @@ -237,28 +274,6 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pt_regs *regs, stack = (unsigned long *)tsk->thread.sp; } - /* - * Print function call entries within a stack. 'cond' is the - * "end of stackframe" condition, that the 'stack++' - * iteration will eventually trigger. - */ -#define HANDLE_STACK(cond) \ - do while (cond) { \ - unsigned long addr = *stack++; \ - /* Use unlocked access here because except for NMIs \ - we should be already protected against module unloads */ \ - if (__kernel_text_address(addr)) { \ - /* \ - * If the address is either in the text segment of the \ - * kernel, or in the region which contains vmalloc'ed \ - * memory, it *may* be the address of a calling \ - * routine; if so, print it so that someone tracing \ - * down the cause of the crash will be able to figure \ - * out the call path that was taken. \ - */ \ - ops->address(data, addr, 1); \ - } \ - } while (0) /* * Print function call entries in all stacks, starting at the @@ -274,7 +289,9 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pt_regs *regs, if (estack_end) { if (ops->stack(data, id) < 0) break; - HANDLE_STACK (stack < estack_end); + + print_context_stack(tinfo, stack, 0, ops, + data, estack_end); ops->stack(data, ""); /* * We link to the next stack via the @@ -292,7 +309,8 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pt_regs *regs, if (stack >= irqstack && stack < irqstack_end) { if (ops->stack(data, "IRQ") < 0) break; - HANDLE_STACK (stack < irqstack_end); + print_context_stack(tinfo, stack, 0, ops, + data, irqstack_end); /* * We link to the next stack (which would be * the process stack normally) the last @@ -310,9 +328,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pt_regs *regs, /* * This handles the process stack: */ - tinfo = task_thread_info(tsk); - HANDLE_STACK (valid_stack_ptr(tinfo, stack)); -#undef HANDLE_STACK + print_context_stack(tinfo, stack, 0, ops, data, NULL); put_cpu(); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_trace);