From: Ingo Molnar Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:58:54 +0000 (-0800) Subject: [PATCH] Fix spinlock debugging delays to not time out too early X-Git-Tag: v2.6.16-rc3~112 X-Git-Url: http://pilppa.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e0a602963485a2f109ae1521c0c55507304c63ed;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git [PATCH] Fix spinlock debugging delays to not time out too early The spinlock-debug wait-loop was using loops_per_jiffy to detect too long spinlock waits - but on fast CPUs this led to a way too fast timeout and false messages. The fix is to include a __delay(1) call in the loop, to correctly approximate the intended delay timeout of 1 second. The code assumes that every architecture implements __delay(1) to last around 1/(loops_per_jiffy*HZ) seconds. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/lib/spinlock_debug.c b/lib/spinlock_debug.c index c8bb8cc899d..d8b6bb419d4 100644 --- a/lib/spinlock_debug.c +++ b/lib/spinlock_debug.c @@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ static void __spin_lock_debug(spinlock_t *lock) for (;;) { for (i = 0; i < loops_per_jiffy * HZ; i++) { - cpu_relax(); if (__raw_spin_trylock(&lock->raw_lock)) return; + __delay(1); } /* lockup suspected: */ if (print_once) { @@ -144,9 +144,9 @@ static void __read_lock_debug(rwlock_t *lock) for (;;) { for (i = 0; i < loops_per_jiffy * HZ; i++) { - cpu_relax(); if (__raw_read_trylock(&lock->raw_lock)) return; + __delay(1); } /* lockup suspected: */ if (print_once) { @@ -217,9 +217,9 @@ static void __write_lock_debug(rwlock_t *lock) for (;;) { for (i = 0; i < loops_per_jiffy * HZ; i++) { - cpu_relax(); if (__raw_write_trylock(&lock->raw_lock)) return; + __delay(1); } /* lockup suspected: */ if (print_once) {