From: Tejun Heo Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 16:15:09 +0000 (+0900) Subject: libata: ignore recovered PHY errors X-Git-Tag: v2.6.26-rc4~120^2~7 X-Git-Url: http://pilppa.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e0614db2a398d4d0dc5fb47fe2c2783141262a3e;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git libata: ignore recovered PHY errors No reason to get overzealous about recovered comm and data errors. Some PHYs habitually sets them w/o no good reason and being draconian about these soft error conditions doesn't seem to help anybody. If need ever rises, we might need to add soft PHY error condition, say AC_ERR_MAYBE_ATA_BUS and use it only to determine whether speed down is necessary but I don't think that's very likely to happen. It's far more likely we'll get timeouts or fatal transmission errors if recovered errors are so prominent that they hamper operation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c index 751dad0138a..7894d83ea1e 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c @@ -1308,12 +1308,7 @@ static void ata_eh_analyze_serror(struct ata_link *link) unsigned int err_mask = 0, action = 0; u32 hotplug_mask; - if (serror & SERR_PERSISTENT) { - err_mask |= AC_ERR_ATA_BUS; - action |= ATA_EH_RESET; - } - if (serror & - (SERR_DATA_RECOVERED | SERR_COMM_RECOVERED | SERR_DATA)) { + if (serror & (SERR_PERSISTENT | SERR_DATA)) { err_mask |= AC_ERR_ATA_BUS; action |= ATA_EH_RESET; }