From: Glauber Costa Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 23:06:36 +0000 (-0800) Subject: ACPI: use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk in acpi_processor_hotplug_notify() X-Git-Tag: v2.6.25-rc6~19^2~2^3~2 X-Git-Url: http://pilppa.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d6f882e10442c1ea6ed5f93365f48be4cb520be7;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git ACPI: use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk in acpi_processor_hotplug_notify() For consistency, use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk in acpi_processor_hotplug_notify() for BUS_CHECK and DEVICE_CHECK events Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Len Brown --- diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c index a3cc8a98255..3501cb53857 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c @@ -897,9 +897,10 @@ acpi_processor_hotplug_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data) switch (event) { case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK: case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK: - printk("Processor driver received %s event\n", + ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, + "Processor driver received %s event\n", (event == ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK) ? - "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK"); + "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK")); if (!is_processor_present(handle)) break;