From: Paul Jackson Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:01:56 +0000 (-0800) Subject: [PATCH] cpuset: numa_policy_rebind cleanup X-Git-Tag: v2.6.16-rc1~822 X-Git-Url: http://pilppa.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=74cb21553f4bf244185b9bec4c26e4e3169ad55e;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git [PATCH] cpuset: numa_policy_rebind cleanup Cleanup, reorganize and make more robust the mempolicy.c code to rebind mempolicies relative to the containing cpuset after a tasks memory placement changes. The real motivator for this cleanup patch is to lay more groundwork for the upcoming patch to correctly rebind NUMA mempolicies that are attached to vma's after the containing cpuset memory placement changes. NUMA mempolicies are constrained by the cpuset their task is a member of. When either (1) a task is moved to a different cpuset, or (2) the 'mems' mems_allowed of a cpuset is changed, then the NUMA mempolicies have embedded node numbers (for MPOL_BIND, MPOL_INTERLEAVE and MPOL_PREFERRED) that need to be recalculated, relative to their new cpuset placement. The old code used an unreliable method of determining what was the old mems_allowed constraining the mempolicy. It just looked at the tasks mems_allowed value. This sort of worked with the present code, that just rebinds the -task- mempolicy, and leaves any -vma- mempolicies broken, referring to the old nodes. But in an upcoming patch, the vma mempolicies will be rebound as well. Then the order in which the various task and vma mempolicies are updated will no longer be deterministic, and one can no longer count on the task->mems_allowed holding the old value for as long as needed. It's not even clear if the current code was guaranteed to work reliably for task mempolicies. So I added a mems_allowed field to each mempolicy, stating exactly what mems_allowed the policy is relative to, and updated synchronously and reliably anytime that the mempolicy is rebound. Also removed a useless wrapper routine, numa_policy_rebind(), and had its caller, cpuset_update_task_memory_state(), call directly to the rewritten policy_rebind() routine, and made that rebind routine extern instead of static, and added a "mpol_" prefix to its name, making it mpol_rebind_policy(). Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/include/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/linux/mempolicy.h index 05fddd5bee5..74357cb9bc7 100644 --- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h +++ b/include/linux/mempolicy.h @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct mempolicy { nodemask_t nodes; /* interleave */ /* undefined for default */ } v; + nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed; /* mempolicy relative to these nodes */ }; /* @@ -146,7 +147,9 @@ struct mempolicy *mpol_shared_policy_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp, extern void numa_default_policy(void); extern void numa_policy_init(void); -extern void numa_policy_rebind(const nodemask_t *old, const nodemask_t *new); +extern void mpol_rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *new); +extern void mpol_rebind_task(struct task_struct *tsk, + const nodemask_t *new); extern struct mempolicy default_policy; extern struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr); @@ -221,7 +224,12 @@ static inline void numa_default_policy(void) { } -static inline void numa_policy_rebind(const nodemask_t *old, +static inline void mpol_rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol, + const nodemask_t *new) +{ +} + +static inline void mpol_rebind_task(struct task_struct *tsk, const nodemask_t *new) { } diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c index 0d0dbbd6560..8f764de3a9e 100644 --- a/kernel/cpuset.c +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c @@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ void cpuset_update_task_memory_state() tsk->cpuset_mems_generation = cs->mems_generation; task_unlock(tsk); up(&callback_sem); - numa_policy_rebind(&oldmem, &tsk->mems_allowed); + mpol_rebind_task(tsk, &tsk->mems_allowed); if (!nodes_equal(oldmem, tsk->mems_allowed)) { if (migrate) { do_migrate_pages(tsk->mm, &oldmem, diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c index 34d566ac147..c39bd86f4ea 100644 --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ static struct mempolicy *mpol_new(int mode, nodemask_t *nodes) break; } policy->policy = mode; + policy->cpuset_mems_allowed = cpuset_mems_allowed(current); return policy; } @@ -1411,25 +1412,31 @@ void numa_default_policy(void) } /* Migrate a policy to a different set of nodes */ -static void rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *old, - const nodemask_t *new) +void mpol_rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *newmask) { + nodemask_t *mpolmask; nodemask_t tmp; if (!pol) return; + mpolmask = &pol->cpuset_mems_allowed; + if (nodes_equal(*mpolmask, *newmask)) + return; switch (pol->policy) { case MPOL_DEFAULT: break; case MPOL_INTERLEAVE: - nodes_remap(tmp, pol->v.nodes, *old, *new); + nodes_remap(tmp, pol->v.nodes, *mpolmask, *newmask); pol->v.nodes = tmp; - current->il_next = node_remap(current->il_next, *old, *new); + *mpolmask = *newmask; + current->il_next = node_remap(current->il_next, + *mpolmask, *newmask); break; case MPOL_PREFERRED: pol->v.preferred_node = node_remap(pol->v.preferred_node, - *old, *new); + *mpolmask, *newmask); + *mpolmask = *newmask; break; case MPOL_BIND: { nodemask_t nodes; @@ -1439,7 +1446,7 @@ static void rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *old, nodes_clear(nodes); for (z = pol->v.zonelist->zones; *z; z++) node_set((*z)->zone_pgdat->node_id, nodes); - nodes_remap(tmp, nodes, *old, *new); + nodes_remap(tmp, nodes, *mpolmask, *newmask); nodes = tmp; zonelist = bind_zonelist(&nodes); @@ -1454,6 +1461,7 @@ static void rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *old, kfree(pol->v.zonelist); pol->v.zonelist = zonelist; } + *mpolmask = *newmask; break; } default: @@ -1463,14 +1471,13 @@ static void rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *old, } /* - * Someone moved this task to different nodes. Fixup mempolicies. - * - * TODO - fixup current->mm->vma and shmfs/tmpfs/hugetlbfs policies as well, - * once we have a cpuset mechanism to mark which cpuset subtree is migrating. + * Wrapper for mpol_rebind_policy() that just requires task + * pointer, and updates task mempolicy. */ -void numa_policy_rebind(const nodemask_t *old, const nodemask_t *new) + +void mpol_rebind_task(struct task_struct *tsk, const nodemask_t *new) { - rebind_policy(current->mempolicy, old, new); + mpol_rebind_policy(tsk->mempolicy, new); } /*