From: Ohad Ben-Cohen Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 06:24:43 +0000 (-0800) Subject: [BLUETOOTH]: Always send explicit hci_ll wake-up acks. X-Git-Tag: v2.6.24-rc8~7^2~7 X-Git-Url: http://pilppa.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5c5482266537fdb24d6b8462540d8f65a6007a97;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git [BLUETOOTH]: Always send explicit hci_ll wake-up acks. In the (rare) event of simultaneous mutual wake up requests, do send the chip an explicit wake-up ack. This is required for Texas Instruments's BRF6350 chip. Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c index 8c3e62a17b4..b91d45a41b2 100644 --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c @@ -204,6 +204,19 @@ static void ll_device_want_to_wakeup(struct hci_uart *hu) spin_lock_irqsave(&ll->hcill_lock, flags); switch (ll->hcill_state) { + case HCILL_ASLEEP_TO_AWAKE: + /* + * This state means that both the host and the BRF chip + * have simultaneously sent a wake-up-indication packet. + * Traditionaly, in this case, receiving a wake-up-indication + * was enough and an additional wake-up-ack wasn't needed. + * This has changed with the BRF6350, which does require an + * explicit wake-up-ack. Other BRF versions, which do not + * require an explicit ack here, do accept it, thus it is + * perfectly safe to always send one. + */ + BT_DBG("dual wake-up-indication"); + /* deliberate fall-through - do not add break */ case HCILL_ASLEEP: /* acknowledge device wake up */ if (send_hcill_cmd(HCILL_WAKE_UP_ACK, hu) < 0) { @@ -211,16 +224,8 @@ static void ll_device_want_to_wakeup(struct hci_uart *hu) goto out; } break; - case HCILL_ASLEEP_TO_AWAKE: - /* - * this state means that a wake-up-indication - * is already on its way to the device, - * and will serve as the required wake-up-ack - */ - BT_DBG("dual wake-up-indication"); - break; default: - /* any other state are illegal */ + /* any other state is illegal */ BT_ERR("received HCILL_WAKE_UP_IND in state %ld", ll->hcill_state); break; }