From: Manfred Spraul Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:48:04 +0000 (-0700) Subject: ipc/sem.c: convert undo structures to struct list_head X-Git-Tag: v2.6.27-rc1~315 X-Git-Url: http://pilppa.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4daa28f6d8f5cda8ea0f55048e3c8811c384cbdd;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git ipc/sem.c: convert undo structures to struct list_head The undo structures contain two linked lists, the attached patch replaces them with generic struct list_head lists. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul Cc: Nadia Derbey Cc: Pierre Peiffer Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/include/linux/sem.h b/include/linux/sem.h index c8eaad9e4b7..6a1af1b49a1 100644 --- a/include/linux/sem.h +++ b/include/linux/sem.h @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ struct sem_array { struct sem *sem_base; /* ptr to first semaphore in array */ struct sem_queue *sem_pending; /* pending operations to be processed */ struct sem_queue **sem_pending_last; /* last pending operation */ - struct sem_undo *undo; /* undo requests on this array */ + struct list_head list_id; /* undo requests on this array */ unsigned long sem_nsems; /* no. of semaphores in array */ }; @@ -118,8 +118,8 @@ struct sem_queue { * when the process exits. */ struct sem_undo { - struct sem_undo * proc_next; /* next entry on this process */ - struct sem_undo * id_next; /* next entry on this semaphore set */ + struct list_head list_proc; /* per-process list: all undos from one process */ + struct list_head list_id; /* per semaphore array list: all undos for one array */ int semid; /* semaphore set identifier */ short * semadj; /* array of adjustments, one per semaphore */ }; @@ -128,9 +128,9 @@ struct sem_undo { * that may be shared among all a CLONE_SYSVSEM task group. */ struct sem_undo_list { - atomic_t refcnt; - spinlock_t lock; - struct sem_undo *proc_list; + atomic_t refcnt; + spinlock_t lock; + struct list_head list_proc; }; struct sysv_sem { diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c index e9418df5ff3..4f26c715735 100644 --- a/ipc/sem.c +++ b/ipc/sem.c @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static int newary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct ipc_params *params) sma->sem_base = (struct sem *) &sma[1]; /* sma->sem_pending = NULL; */ sma->sem_pending_last = &sma->sem_pending; - /* sma->undo = NULL; */ + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sma->list_id); sma->sem_nsems = nsems; sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds(); sem_unlock(sma); @@ -536,7 +536,8 @@ static void freeary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp) * (They will be freed without any further action in exit_sem() * or during the next semop.) */ - for (un = sma->undo; un; un = un->id_next) + assert_spin_locked(&sma->sem_perm.lock); + list_for_each_entry(un, &sma->list_id, list_id) un->semid = -1; /* Wake up all pending processes and let them fail with EIDRM. */ @@ -763,9 +764,12 @@ static int semctl_main(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid, int semnum, for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++) sma->sem_base[i].semval = sem_io[i]; - for (un = sma->undo; un; un = un->id_next) + + assert_spin_locked(&sma->sem_perm.lock); + list_for_each_entry(un, &sma->list_id, list_id) { for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++) un->semadj[i] = 0; + } sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds(); /* maybe some queued-up processes were waiting for this */ update_queue(sma); @@ -797,12 +801,15 @@ static int semctl_main(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid, int semnum, { int val = arg.val; struct sem_undo *un; + err = -ERANGE; if (val > SEMVMX || val < 0) goto out_unlock; - for (un = sma->undo; un; un = un->id_next) + assert_spin_locked(&sma->sem_perm.lock); + list_for_each_entry(un, &sma->list_id, list_id) un->semadj[semnum] = 0; + curr->semval = val; curr->sempid = task_tgid_vnr(current); sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds(); @@ -952,6 +959,8 @@ static inline int get_undo_list(struct sem_undo_list **undo_listp) return -ENOMEM; spin_lock_init(&undo_list->lock); atomic_set(&undo_list->refcnt, 1); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&undo_list->list_proc); + current->sysvsem.undo_list = undo_list; } *undo_listp = undo_list; @@ -960,25 +969,30 @@ static inline int get_undo_list(struct sem_undo_list **undo_listp) static struct sem_undo *lookup_undo(struct sem_undo_list *ulp, int semid) { - struct sem_undo **last, *un; - - last = &ulp->proc_list; - un = *last; - while(un != NULL) { - if(un->semid==semid) - break; - if(un->semid==-1) { - *last=un->proc_next; - kfree(un); - } else { - last=&un->proc_next; + struct sem_undo *walk, *tmp; + + assert_spin_locked(&ulp->lock); + list_for_each_entry_safe(walk, tmp, &ulp->list_proc, list_proc) { + if (walk->semid == semid) + return walk; + if (walk->semid == -1) { + list_del(&walk->list_proc); + kfree(walk); } - un=*last; } - return un; + return NULL; } -static struct sem_undo *find_undo(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid) +/** + * find_alloc_undo - Lookup (and if not present create) undo array + * @ns: namespace + * @semid: semaphore array id + * + * The function looks up (and if not present creates) the undo structure. + * The size of the undo structure depends on the size of the semaphore + * array, thus the alloc path is not that straightforward. + */ +static struct sem_undo *find_alloc_undo(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid) { struct sem_array *sma; struct sem_undo_list *ulp; @@ -997,6 +1011,7 @@ static struct sem_undo *find_undo(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid) goto out; /* no undo structure around - allocate one. */ + /* step 1: figure out the size of the semaphore array */ sma = sem_lock_check(ns, semid); if (IS_ERR(sma)) return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(sma)); @@ -1004,15 +1019,19 @@ static struct sem_undo *find_undo(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid) nsems = sma->sem_nsems; sem_getref_and_unlock(sma); + /* step 2: allocate new undo structure */ new = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sem_undo) + sizeof(short)*nsems, GFP_KERNEL); if (!new) { sem_putref(sma); return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); } - new->semadj = (short *) &new[1]; - new->semid = semid; + /* step 3: Acquire the lock on the undo list pointer */ spin_lock(&ulp->lock); + + /* step 4: check for races: someone else allocated the undo struct, + * semaphore array was destroyed. + */ un = lookup_undo(ulp, semid); if (un) { spin_unlock(&ulp->lock); @@ -1028,13 +1047,17 @@ static struct sem_undo *find_undo(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid) un = ERR_PTR(-EIDRM); goto out; } - new->proc_next = ulp->proc_list; - ulp->proc_list = new; - new->id_next = sma->undo; - sma->undo = new; + /* step 5: initialize & link new undo structure */ + new->semadj = (short *) &new[1]; + new->semid = semid; + assert_spin_locked(&ulp->lock); + list_add(&new->list_proc, &ulp->list_proc); + assert_spin_locked(&sma->sem_perm.lock); + list_add(&new->list_id, &sma->list_id); + sem_unlock(sma); - un = new; spin_unlock(&ulp->lock); + un = new; out: return un; } @@ -1090,9 +1113,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf __user *tsops, alter = 1; } -retry_undos: if (undos) { - un = find_undo(ns, semid); + un = find_alloc_undo(ns, semid); if (IS_ERR(un)) { error = PTR_ERR(un); goto out_free; @@ -1107,14 +1129,14 @@ retry_undos: } /* - * semid identifiers are not unique - find_undo may have + * semid identifiers are not unique - find_alloc_undo may have * allocated an undo structure, it was invalidated by an RMID - * and now a new array with received the same id. Check and retry. + * and now a new array with received the same id. Check and fail. */ - if (un && un->semid == -1) { - sem_unlock(sma); - goto retry_undos; - } + error = -EIDRM; + if (un && un->semid == -1) + goto out_unlock_free; + error = -EFBIG; if (max >= sma->sem_nsems) goto out_unlock_free; @@ -1243,56 +1265,44 @@ int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk) */ void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk) { - struct sem_undo_list *undo_list; - struct sem_undo *u, **up; - struct ipc_namespace *ns; + struct sem_undo_list *ulp; + struct sem_undo *un, *tmp; - undo_list = tsk->sysvsem.undo_list; - if (!undo_list) + ulp = tsk->sysvsem.undo_list; + if (!ulp) return; tsk->sysvsem.undo_list = NULL; - if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&undo_list->refcnt)) + if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&ulp->refcnt)) return; - ns = tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns; - /* There's no need to hold the semundo list lock, as current - * is the last task exiting for this undo list. - */ - for (up = &undo_list->proc_list; (u = *up); *up = u->proc_next, kfree(u)) { + spin_lock(&ulp->lock); + + list_for_each_entry_safe(un, tmp, &ulp->list_proc, list_proc) { struct sem_array *sma; - int nsems, i; - struct sem_undo *un, **unp; - int semid; - - semid = u->semid; - - if(semid == -1) - continue; - sma = sem_lock(ns, semid); + int i; + + if (un->semid == -1) + goto free; + + sma = sem_lock(tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns, un->semid); if (IS_ERR(sma)) - continue; + goto free; - if (u->semid == -1) - goto next_entry; + if (un->semid == -1) + goto unlock_free; - BUG_ON(sem_checkid(sma, u->semid)); + BUG_ON(sem_checkid(sma, un->semid)); - /* remove u from the sma->undo list */ - for (unp = &sma->undo; (un = *unp); unp = &un->id_next) { - if (u == un) - goto found; - } - printk ("exit_sem undo list error id=%d\n", u->semid); - goto next_entry; -found: - *unp = un->id_next; - /* perform adjustments registered in u */ - nsems = sma->sem_nsems; - for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++) { + /* remove un from sma->list_id */ + assert_spin_locked(&sma->sem_perm.lock); + list_del(&un->list_id); + + /* perform adjustments registered in un */ + for (i = 0; i < sma->sem_nsems; i++) { struct sem * semaphore = &sma->sem_base[i]; - if (u->semadj[i]) { - semaphore->semval += u->semadj[i]; + if (un->semadj[i]) { + semaphore->semval += un->semadj[i]; /* * Range checks of the new semaphore value, * not defined by sus: @@ -1316,10 +1326,15 @@ found: sma->sem_otime = get_seconds(); /* maybe some queued-up processes were waiting for this */ update_queue(sma); -next_entry: +unlock_free: sem_unlock(sma); +free: + assert_spin_locked(&ulp->lock); + list_del(&un->list_proc); + kfree(un); } - kfree(undo_list); + spin_unlock(&ulp->lock); + kfree(ulp); } #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS