From: Pavel Machek Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:15:21 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Document handling of bad memory X-Git-Tag: v2.6.29-rc1~43^2~1 X-Git-Url: http://pilppa.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2884f00b94be73a6a7875bada739bf9bb2f9a1b6;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git Document handling of bad memory Document how to deal with bad memory reported with memtest. Signed-off-by: Jan-Simon Möller Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- diff --git a/Documentation/bad_memory.txt b/Documentation/bad_memory.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..df841621320 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/bad_memory.txt @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +March 2008 +Jan-Simon Moeller, dl9pf@gmx.de + + +How to deal with bad memory e.g. reported by memtest86+ ? +######################################################### + +There are three possibilities I know of: + +1) Reinsert/swap the memory modules + +2) Buy new modules (best!) or try to exchange the memory + if you have spare-parts + +3) Use BadRAM or memmap + +This Howto is about number 3) . + + +BadRAM +###### +BadRAM is the actively developed and available as kernel-patch +here: http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/ + +For more details see the BadRAM documentation. + +memmap +###### + +memmap is already in the kernel and usable as kernel-parameter at +boot-time. Its syntax is slightly strange and you may need to +calculate the values by yourself! + +Syntax to exclude a memory area (see kernel-parameters.txt for details): +memmap=$
+ +Example: memtest86+ reported here errors at address 0x18691458, 0x18698424 and + some others. All had 0x1869xxxx in common, so I chose a pattern of + 0x18690000,0xffff0000. + +With the numbers of the example above: +memmap=64K$0x18690000 + or +memmap=0x10000$0x18690000 +