From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:53:24 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: lockdep: remove extra "irq" string
X-Git-Url: http://pilppa.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=26575e28df5eb2050c02369843faba38cecb4d8c;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git

lockdep: remove extra "irq" string

Impact: clarify lockdep printk text

print_irq_inversion_bug() gets handed state strings of the form

  "HARDIRQ", "SOFTIRQ", "RECLAIM_FS"

and appends "-irq-{un,}safe" to them, which is either redudant for *IRQ or
confusing in the RECLAIM_FS case.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1236175192.5330.7585.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---

diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index ef6584fd9fe..02014f7ccc8 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -1900,9 +1900,9 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct lock_class *other,
 		curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
 	print_lock(this);
 	if (forwards)
-		printk("but this lock took another, %s-irq-unsafe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
+		printk("but this lock took another, %s-unsafe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
 	else
-		printk("but this lock was taken by another, %s-irq-safe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
+		printk("but this lock was taken by another, %s-safe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
 	print_lock_name(other);
 	printk("\n\nand interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.\n\n");