From: Jing Min Zhao Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 23:44:40 +0000 (-0700) Subject: [NETFILTER]: nf_nat_h323: call set_h225_addr instead of set_h225_addr_hook X-Git-Tag: v2.6.22-rc3~9^2~4 X-Git-Url: http://pilppa.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1ff75ed254bdbb47bb0c1d71a3cc65f6831a8e3a;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git [NETFILTER]: nf_nat_h323: call set_h225_addr instead of set_h225_addr_hook They're the same. Signed-off-by: Jing Min Zhao Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_h323.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_h323.c index fcebc968d37..c5d2a2d690b 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_h323.c +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_h323.c @@ -455,9 +455,9 @@ static int nat_q931(struct sk_buff **pskb, struct nf_conn *ct, if (idx > 0 && get_h225_addr(ct, *data, &taddr[0], &addr, &port) && (ntohl(addr.ip) & 0xff000000) == 0x7f000000) { - set_h225_addr_hook(pskb, data, 0, &taddr[0], - &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3, - info->sig_port[!dir]); + set_h225_addr(pskb, data, 0, &taddr[0], + &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3, + info->sig_port[!dir]); } } else { nf_conntrack_unexpect_related(exp);