From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:46:39 +0000 (+0100) Subject: ide: inline task_in_unexpected() into task_pio_intr() X-Git-Url: http://pilppa.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=151055ed84df7bebc77d88471302a7cd02c6e0a4;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git ide: inline task_in_unexpected() into task_pio_intr() task_in_unexpected() is only used by task_pio_intr() so inline it there. There should be no functional changes caused by this patch. Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz --- diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c b/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c index 99d6ed43497..a01c2c0450d 100644 --- a/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c @@ -313,27 +313,6 @@ void ide_finish_cmd(ide_drive_t *drive, struct ide_cmd *cmd, u8 stat) ide_end_request(drive, 1, cmd->rq->nr_sectors); } -/* - * We got an interrupt on a task_in case, but no errors and no DRQ. - * - * It might be a spurious irq (shared irq), but it might be a - * command that had no output. - */ -static ide_startstop_t task_in_unexpected(ide_drive_t *drive, - struct ide_cmd *cmd, u8 stat) -{ - /* Command all done? */ - if (OK_STAT(stat, ATA_DRDY, ATA_BUSY)) { - ide_finish_cmd(drive, cmd, stat); - return ide_stopped; - } - - /* Assume it was a spurious irq */ - ide_set_handler(drive, &task_pio_intr, WAIT_WORSTCASE, NULL); - - return ide_started; -} - /* * Handler for command with PIO data phase. */ @@ -350,8 +329,19 @@ static ide_startstop_t task_pio_intr(ide_drive_t *drive) return task_error(drive, cmd, __func__, stat); /* Didn't want any data? Odd. */ - if ((stat & ATA_DRQ) == 0) - return task_in_unexpected(drive, cmd, stat); + if ((stat & ATA_DRQ) == 0) { + /* Command all done? */ + if (OK_STAT(stat, ATA_DRDY, ATA_BUSY)) { + ide_finish_cmd(drive, cmd, stat); + return ide_stopped; + } + + /* Assume it was a spurious irq */ + ide_set_handler(drive, &task_pio_intr, WAIT_WORSTCASE, + NULL); + + return ide_started; + } } else { if (!OK_STAT(stat, DRIVE_READY, drive->bad_wstat)) return task_error(drive, cmd, __func__, stat);