From: Jonathan Corbet Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 20:27:41 +0000 (-0600) Subject: Add cycle_kernel_lock() X-Git-Tag: v2.6.27-rc1~1103^2~88 X-Git-Url: http://pilppa.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0b2806768899dba5967bcd4a3b93eaed9a1dc4f3;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git Add cycle_kernel_lock() A number of driver functions are so obviously trivial that they do not need the big kernel lock - at least not overtly. It turns out that the acquisition of the BKL in driver open() functions can perform a sort of poor-hacker's serialization function, delaying the open operation until the driver is certain to have completed its initialization. Add a simple cycle_kernel_lock() function for these cases to make it clear that there is no need to *hold* the BKL, just to be sure that we can acquire it. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- diff --git a/include/linux/smp_lock.h b/include/linux/smp_lock.h index aab3a4cff4e..813be59bf34 100644 --- a/include/linux/smp_lock.h +++ b/include/linux/smp_lock.h @@ -27,11 +27,24 @@ static inline int reacquire_kernel_lock(struct task_struct *task) extern void __lockfunc lock_kernel(void) __acquires(kernel_lock); extern void __lockfunc unlock_kernel(void) __releases(kernel_lock); +/* + * Various legacy drivers don't really need the BKL in a specific + * function, but they *do* need to know that the BKL became available. + * This function just avoids wrapping a bunch of lock/unlock pairs + * around code which doesn't really need it. + */ +static inline void cycle_kernel_lock(void) +{ + lock_kernel(); + unlock_kernel(); +} + #else #define lock_kernel() do { } while(0) #define unlock_kernel() do { } while(0) #define release_kernel_lock(task) do { } while(0) +#define cycle_kernel_lock() do { } while(0) #define reacquire_kernel_lock(task) 0 #define kernel_locked() 1