From: Jens Axboe Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:34:51 +0000 (+0100) Subject: splice: only return -EAGAIN if there's hope of more data X-Git-Tag: v2.6.25-rc4~98^2~15 X-Git-Url: http://pilppa.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=02cf01aea5af7a4d1a38045712fe11bffcc206b0;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git splice: only return -EAGAIN if there's hope of more data sys_tee() currently is a bit eager in returning -EAGAIN, it may do so even if we don't have a chance of anymore data becoming available. So improve the logic and only return -EAGAIN if we have an attached writer to the input pipe. Reported by Johann Felix Soden and Patrick McManus . Tested-by: Johann Felix Soden Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c index 9b559ee711a..0670c915cd3 100644 --- a/fs/splice.c +++ b/fs/splice.c @@ -1669,6 +1669,13 @@ static int link_pipe(struct pipe_inode_info *ipipe, i++; } while (len); + /* + * return EAGAIN if we have the potential of some data in the + * future, otherwise just return 0 + */ + if (!ret && ipipe->waiting_writers && (flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK)) + ret = -EAGAIN; + inode_double_unlock(ipipe->inode, opipe->inode); /* @@ -1709,11 +1716,8 @@ static long do_tee(struct file *in, struct file *out, size_t len, ret = link_ipipe_prep(ipipe, flags); if (!ret) { ret = link_opipe_prep(opipe, flags); - if (!ret) { + if (!ret) ret = link_pipe(ipipe, opipe, len, flags); - if (!ret && (flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK)) - ret = -EAGAIN; - } } }