Le lundi 30 mars 2009, Chris Wright a écrit :
> q->queue could be ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) which will break unwinding
> on error. Make iscsi_pool_free more defensive.
>
Making the freeing of q->queue dependent on q->pool being set looks
really weird (although it is correct at the moment. But this seems
to be fixable in a much simpler way.
With the benefit that only the error case is slowed down. In both
cases we have a problem if q->queue contains an error value but it's
not -ENOMEM. Apparently this can't happen today, but it doesn't feel
right to assume this will always be true. Maybe it's the right time
to fix this as well.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
q->queue = kfifo_init((void*)q->pool, max * sizeof(void*),
GFP_KERNEL, NULL);
- if (q->queue == ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM))
+ if (IS_ERR(q->queue)) {
+ q->queue = NULL;
goto enomem;
+ }
for (i = 0; i < max; i++) {
q->pool[i] = kzalloc(item_size, GFP_KERNEL);