[TCP]: FRTO undo response falls back to ratehalving one if ECEd

Undoing ssthresh is disabled in fastretrans_alert whenever
FLAG_ECE is set by clearing prior_ssthresh. The clearing does
not protect FRTO because FRTO operates before fastretrans_alert.
Moving the clearing of prior_ssthresh earlier seems to be a
suboptimal solution to the FRTO case because then FLAG_ECE will
cause a second ssthresh reduction in try_to_open (the first
occurred when FRTO was entered). So instead, FRTO falls back
immediately to the rate halving response, which switches TCP to
CA_CWR state preventing the latter reduction of ssthresh.

If the first ECE arrived before the ACK after which FRTO is able
to decide RTO as spurious, prior_ssthresh is already cleared.
Thus no undoing for ssthresh occurs. Besides, FLAG_ECE should be
set also in the following ACKs resulting in rate halving response
that sees TCP is already in CA_CWR, which again prevents an extra
ssthresh reduction on that round-trip.

If the first ECE arrived before RTO, ssthresh has already been
adapted and prior_ssthresh remains cleared on entry because TCP
is in CA_CWR (the same applies also to a case where FRTO is
entered more than once and ECE comes in the middle).

High_seq must not be touched after tcp_enter_cwr because CWR
round-trip calculation depends on it.

I believe that after this patch, FRTO should be ECN-safe and
even able to take advantage of synergy benefits.

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index cb715eadf8f59bb48b689608c6519d180744dd10..d894bbcc1d240e006a4a1f3713bb0e11760d8548 100644 (file)
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -2587,14 +2587,15 @@ static void tcp_conservative_spur_to_response(struct tcp_sock *tp)
  */
 static void tcp_ratehalving_spur_to_response(struct sock *sk)
 {
-       struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
        tcp_enter_cwr(sk, 0);
-       tp->high_seq = tp->frto_highmark;       /* Smoother w/o this? - ij */
 }
 
-static void tcp_undo_spur_to_response(struct sock *sk)
+static void tcp_undo_spur_to_response(struct sock *sk, int flag)
 {
-       tcp_undo_cwr(sk, 1);
+       if (flag&FLAG_ECE)
+               tcp_ratehalving_spur_to_response(sk);
+       else
+               tcp_undo_cwr(sk, 1);
 }
 
 /* F-RTO spurious RTO detection algorithm (RFC4138)
@@ -2681,7 +2682,7 @@ static int tcp_process_frto(struct sock *sk, u32 prior_snd_una, int flag)
        } else /* frto_counter == 2 */ {
                switch (sysctl_tcp_frto_response) {
                case 2:
-                       tcp_undo_spur_to_response(sk);
+                       tcp_undo_spur_to_response(sk, flag);
                        break;
                case 1:
                        tcp_conservative_spur_to_response(tp);