There's no reason to get an extra reference to sysfs_dirent for an
open file. Open file has a reference to the dentry which in turn has
a reference to sysfs_dirent. This is fairly obvious as otherwise open
itself won't be able to access the sysfs_dirent. Kill the extra
sysfs_get() and matching sysfs_put().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
mutex_init(&bb->mutex);
file->private_data = bb;
- /* open succeeded, put active reference and pin attr_sd */
+ /* open succeeded, put active reference */
sysfs_put_active(attr_sd);
- sysfs_get(attr_sd);
return 0;
err_out:
if (bb->mmapped)
sysfs_put_active_two(attr_sd);
- sysfs_put(attr_sd);
kfree(bb->buffer);
kfree(bb);
return 0;
buffer->ops = ops;
file->private_data = buffer;
- /* open succeeded, put active references and pin attr_sd */
+ /* open succeeded, put active references */
sysfs_put_active_two(attr_sd);
- sysfs_get(attr_sd);
return 0;
err_out:
static int sysfs_release(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp)
{
- struct sysfs_dirent *attr_sd = filp->f_path.dentry->d_fsdata;
struct sysfs_buffer *buffer = filp->private_data;
- sysfs_put(attr_sd);
-
if (buffer) {
if (buffer->page)
free_page((unsigned long)buffer->page);