]> pilppa.com Git - linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git/commitdiff
Fix compile error on nommu for is_swap_pte
authorMatt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Sat, 9 Feb 2008 08:10:12 +0000 (00:10 -0800)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:08:33 +0000 (11:08 -0800)
  CC      mm/vmscan.o
In file included from
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/mm/vmscan.c:44:
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include/linux/swapops.h: In function 'is_swap_pte':
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include/linux/swapops.h:48: error: implicit declaration of function 'pte_none'
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include/linux/swapops.h:48: error: implicit declaration of function 'pte_present'

Does it ever make sense to ask "is this pte a swap entry?" on a machine
with no MMU?  Presumably this also means it has no ptes too, right?  In
which case, it's better to comment the whole function out.  Then when
someone tries to ask the above meaningless question, they get a compile
error rather than a meaningless answer.

Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Reported-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
include/linux/swapops.h

index 7bf2d149d209615be247da2dadc4385f37636be5..6ec39ab27b4b48aaf31b02a19bf5a164217abcce 100644 (file)
@@ -42,11 +42,13 @@ static inline pgoff_t swp_offset(swp_entry_t entry)
        return entry.val & SWP_OFFSET_MASK(entry);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
 /* check whether a pte points to a swap entry */
 static inline int is_swap_pte(pte_t pte)
 {
        return !pte_none(pte) && !pte_present(pte) && !pte_file(pte);
 }
+#endif
 
 /*
  * Convert the arch-dependent pte representation of a swp_entry_t into an