The fid/vid masks for parts using the extended parts are slightly incorrect and can result in
incorrect fid/vid codes being applied. No instances of this problem have been reported in
the field but it could be a problem with future parts.
Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
u32 vid;
if (data->exttype) {
- fid = data->acpi_data.states[i].status & FID_MASK;
- vid = (data->acpi_data.states[i].status >> VID_SHIFT) & VID_MASK;
+ fid = data->acpi_data.states[i].status & EXT_FID_MASK;
+ vid = (data->acpi_data.states[i].status >> VID_SHIFT) & EXT_VID_MASK;
} else {
fid = data->acpi_data.states[i].control & FID_MASK;
vid = (data->acpi_data.states[i].control >> VID_SHIFT) & VID_MASK;
#define MVS_MASK 3
#define VST_MASK 0x7f
#define VID_MASK 0x1f
-#define FID_MASK 0x3f
+#define FID_MASK 0x1f
+#define EXT_VID_MASK 0x3f
+#define EXT_FID_MASK 0x3f
/*