[ARM] clkdev: fix clock matching

The old matching algorithm was too fuzzy, causing false positives.
For example, when asked for device D connection C1 and we only find
device D connection C2, we return that as a valid match despite the
connection names being different.

Change the algorithm such that:
  An entry with a NULL ID is assumed to be a wildcard.
  If an entry has a device ID, it must match
  If an entry has a connection ID, it must match

However, we maintain the order of precidence while still only doing
a single pass over all entries: dev+con > dev only > con only.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

diff --git a/arch/arm/common/clkdev.c b/arch/arm/common/clkdev.c
index 17a17b49a45b850e7531d740fc43a7ed7e429101..1037bba18329ec6f15cce8d3388cb9ea1d79748e 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/arm/common/clkdev.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/clkdev.c
@@ -24,6 +24,15 @@
 static LIST_HEAD(clocks);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(clocks_mutex);
 
+/*
+ * Find the correct struct clk for the device and connection ID.
+ * We do slightly fuzzy matching here:
+ *  An entry with a NULL ID is assumed to be a wildcard.
+ *  If an entry has a device ID, it must match
+ *  If an entry has a connection ID, it must match
+ * Then we take the most specific entry - with the following
+ * order of precidence: dev+con > dev only > con only.
+ */
 static struct clk *clk_find(const char *dev_id, const char *con_id)
 {
        struct clk_lookup *p;
@@ -31,13 +40,17 @@ static struct clk *clk_find(const char *dev_id, const char *con_id)
        int match, best = 0;
 
        list_for_each_entry(p, &clocks, node) {
-               if ((p->dev_id && !dev_id) || (p->con_id && !con_id))
-                       continue;
                match = 0;
-               if (p->dev_id)
-                       match += 2 * (strcmp(p->dev_id, dev_id) == 0);
-               if (p->con_id)
-                       match += 1 * (strcmp(p->con_id, con_id) == 0);
+               if (p->dev_id) {
+                       if (!dev_id || strcmp(p->dev_id, dev_id))
+                               continue;
+                       match += 2;
+               }
+               if (p->con_id) {
+                       if (!con_id || strcmp(p->con_id, con_id))
+                               continue;
+                       match += 1;
+               }
                if (match == 0)
                        continue;