[BNX2]: Fix minor bug in bnx2_has_work().

It is more correct to get the status block from the bnx2_napi struct
instead of the bnx2 struct.  It happens that they are the same in this
case because we are using the first MSIX vector.

Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
index 44734613ab37c1f777c0a5398e7fb9173ed0b66d..18ed8068dc2ddca9b50c0a3e8fb0c5bb0ad95da1 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/net/bnx2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
@@ -2903,8 +2903,7 @@ bnx2_tx_msix(int irq, void *dev_instance)
 static inline int
 bnx2_has_work(struct bnx2_napi *bnapi)
 {
-       struct bnx2 *bp = bnapi->bp;
-       struct status_block *sblk = bp->status_blk;
+       struct status_block *sblk = bnapi->status_blk;
 
        if ((bnx2_get_hw_rx_cons(bnapi) != bnapi->rx_cons) ||
            (bnx2_get_hw_tx_cons(bnapi) != bnapi->hw_tx_cons))