[SCSI] zfcp: Remove field sbal_last from trace record.

This field is not needed, because it designates an index with a fix offset
from sbal_first. It's name is confusing anyway.

Signed-off-by: Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c
index 1710c12a32c43a5506d8ff08514dd5eeb9ab4422..efd60c4af4c64eac69141ea00613d3a52d539416 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c
@@ -187,7 +187,6 @@ void zfcp_hba_dbf_event_fsf_response(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
        response->fsf_req_status = fsf_req->status;
        response->sbal_first = fsf_req->sbal_first;
        response->sbal_curr = fsf_req->sbal_curr;
-       response->sbal_last = fsf_req->sbal_last;
        response->pool = fsf_req->pool != NULL;
        response->erp_action = (unsigned long)fsf_req->erp_action;
 
@@ -356,7 +355,6 @@ static void zfcp_hba_dbf_view_response(char **p,
        zfcp_dbf_out(p, "fsf_req_status", "0x%08x", r->fsf_req_status);
        zfcp_dbf_out(p, "sbal_first", "0x%02x", r->sbal_first);
        zfcp_dbf_out(p, "sbal_curr", "0x%02x", r->sbal_curr);
-       zfcp_dbf_out(p, "sbal_last", "0x%02x", r->sbal_last);
        zfcp_dbf_out(p, "pool", "0x%02x", r->pool);
 
        switch (r->fsf_command) {

diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.h b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.h
index 54c34e483457dbb11616b8a4b736b86a77e80858..66b8754840b22338f702fd25e67b0a7c0bf57c60 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.h
@@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ struct zfcp_hba_dbf_record_response {
        u32 fsf_req_status;
        u8 sbal_first;
        u8 sbal_curr;
-       u8 sbal_last;
        u8 pool;
        u64 erp_action;
        union {