[PATCH] usb-storage: Some minor shuttle_usbat cleanups
A while ago, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> Looks good. Tho, I would like to see a future patch to do two things:
> 1) Change comments from C++ style to C-style
> 2) Make sure we're naming consistently everywhere SCM, USBAT,
> USBAT-02 (most noticably needing fixing is the string used at
> transport-selection time, but a sweep of all uses to be consistent
> would be in order).
Sorry for the long delay, here is a patch to address this. I also clarified
some ATA/ATAPI wording + function names.