The second seems correct, but the first has a silly repetition of the
PCI device before the actual message. The message originates from
e1000_eeprom_checks in e1000e/netdev.c.
With this patch below the first message becomes
e1000e 0000:01:00.0: Warning: detected DSPD enabled in EEPROM
which makes it similar to directly preceding messages.
Use dev_warn instead of e_warn in e1000_eeprom_checks() as the interface
name has not yet been assigned at that point.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>