]> pilppa.com Git - linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git/commit
sched: pre-route RT tasks on wakeup
authorGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:08:10 +0000 (21:08 +0100)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:08:10 +0000 (21:08 +0100)
commit318e0893ce3f524ca045f9fd9dfd567c0a6f9446
tree94eb9b03fc51033e87bc222861a5906233abae67
parent2de0b4639f4b1b6bfe31f795e5855f041f177170
sched: pre-route RT tasks on wakeup

In the original patch series that Steven Rostedt and I worked on together,
we both took different approaches to low-priority wakeup path.  I utilized
"pre-routing" (push the task away to a less important RQ before activating)
approach, while Steve utilized a "post-routing" approach.  The advantage of
my approach is that you avoid the overhead of a wasted activate/deactivate
cycle and peripherally related burdens.  The advantage of Steve's method is
that it neatly solves an issue preventing a "pull" optimization from being
deployed.

In the end, we ended up deploying Steve's idea.  But it later dawned on me
that we could get the best of both worlds by deploying both ideas together,
albeit slightly modified.

The idea is simple:  Use a "light-weight" lookup for pre-routing, since we
only need to approximate a good home for the task.  And we also retain the
post-routing push logic to clean up any inaccuracies caused by a condition
of "priority mistargeting" caused by the lightweight lookup.  Most of the
time, the pre-routing should work and yield lower overhead.  In the cases
where it doesnt, the post-router will bat cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
kernel/sched_rt.c